How would you treat the word „university“? I have the impression that it is the same family as „team“ and „personal“ because it can be treated both as singular and as plural according to the sentences. Most of the time, it is treated as singularly as in: The theme of this sentence is 1 percent. Fractions and percentages, such as team and staff, can be singular or plural depending on the next object of the preposition. In this case, the American is the subject of the preposition of. Since Americans are plural, one percent becomes plural in the sense. In the example sentence, the word „the“ is useless, and the richest word seems to be an adjective that lacks a word to change. In addition, the word understood is misused. I also find the use of the plural form with collective subtantes problematic. One of the examples cited (the team was satisfied with its presentations) raises the question of the use of „sound“ as a preposition pronoun. If „the team“ is considered a singular, then the correct pronoun would be to give „he“ „The team was happy with its presentations.“ This seems to me to be quite acceptable, even if the prepositional name „presentations“ is plural. This appears to run counter to the alleged principle that the case is based on plurality or not on prepositional-Nov. Some collective nouns may accept either a singular or a plural verb, depending on their use in the sentence. Collective nouns can be difficult because it is up to the sentencer to determine whether the name acts as an entity or whether the sentence indicates greater individuality.
In your first example, „India has a team of players who are engaged“, the team of players who act with individuality within the unit. In your sentence „A group of doctors goes to Haiti „, the word group is a collective nobiss that acts as a unit. Therefore, it is treated as a singular noun and uses the singular verb is. Team names and music group names that are plural take plurals. For example: The Yankees are in first place. The Jonas Brothers are popular. I just want to know what`s right. Are treating physicians responsible or responsible? We use singular verbs with collective nouns, if we consider the name as a single impersonal unit.
This means that each member of the group does the same thing. There are no individually different actions within the group. Each member acts in negotiation and the unit itself is used in an impersonal context. Let`s take the following example: If members of a collective name perform an action as individuals, use a plural verb. In this case, all or some members of the group do something independently of the other members; the group does not act together as a unit. 4. For compound subjects bound by or/nor, the verb corresponds to the subject that comes close to it. However, if the same teams are called by their location (z.B. Chicago, Colorado, Minnesota) or as a general collective noun (z.B team, defense, offensive), they follow the traditional verbal subject agreement: with a collective noun, the author will generally determine whether it acts as a unit or group among many others. A plural noun that follows the preposition of leaves opens up the possibility of a plural verb. Your interpretation makes your second example acceptable. In many cases, it may seem more natural to make the subject plural in shape by adding a word as members: the object of the sentence is the plural-nov question, which is not a collective noun.
Therefore, use the plural verb. Sugar is unspeakable; Therefore, the sentence has a singular verb. Since you used the singular verb is, the team acts as a unit. Therefore, use the unique possessive sound. In our article 6 of the reference and verb convention, it says, „As a general rule, you use a plural verb with two or more subjects when they are related.“ In your example, participants act individually within the unit. Therefore, use the plural verb.