Guatemala, like many other countries around the world, has been grappling with the issue of illegal immigration for quite some time. In an effort to address this issue, the country recently signed a Safe Third Agreement with the United States. This agreement has been met with both praise and criticism, with many arguing that it could have significant consequences for asylum seekers and migrants.
What is the Safe Third Agreement?
The Safe Third Agreement between Guatemala and the United States was signed in July 2019. Under this agreement, migrants who pass through Guatemala on their way to the United States are required to seek asylum in Guatemala first before they can seek asylum in the United States. In other words, Guatemala is now considered a „safe third country“ for migrants seeking asylum.
What are the implications of the Safe Third Agreement?
The Safe Third Agreement has significant implications for asylum seekers and migrants. Many critics argue that Guatemala is not a safe country for asylum seekers and that this agreement could put their lives in danger. Guatemala has a high crime rate and a history of violence and political instability. Asylum seekers who are forced to stay in Guatemala may face persecution, violence, and other forms of danger.
Furthermore, the Safe Third Agreement could make it more difficult for migrants to seek asylum in the United States. Asylum seekers who are required to seek asylum in Guatemala first may face additional hurdles in the asylum process, including language barriers and lack of access to legal counsel.
Despite these concerns, supporters of the Safe Third Agreement argue that it could help to curb illegal immigration and protect the integrity of the U.S. asylum system. By requiring asylum seekers to seek asylum in the first safe country they arrive in, the agreement may help to deter migrants from making the dangerous journey to the United States. Additionally, the agreement could help to prevent fraudulent asylum claims and ensure that those who truly need asylum are able to receive it.
What`s next for the Safe Third Agreement?
Since the Safe Third Agreement was signed, there have been numerous legal challenges and debates about its legality and effectiveness. In January 2020, a U.S. federal judge blocked the Trump administration`s efforts to enforce the agreement, arguing that it was „arbitrary and capricious“ and violated U.S. immigration law.
Despite this setback, the Safe Third Agreement is still in effect and continues to be a source of debate and controversy. As the United States continues to grapple with the issue of illegal immigration, it`s likely that the agreement will continue to be a topic of discussion in the years to come.